This is the first half of my notes on Desiring China...again, this will be boring. These are just some points I liked from the book, but I have yet to go into any detail about how I felt about them. So here are some glorious notes...please don't fall asleep.
Desiring China (first half)
Yearnings
-first melodrama to captivate Chinese audiences
-1991
-non-political
-realist portrayal of life
-taught the viewers to embody desires
-gender class and positions
-it taught longing (?) (pg. 37)
-repressed people allowed and deserve desire (?)
China
-“popular culture in China, as elsewhere, functions as a contradictory cultural site, where domination, opposition, and cultural creation coexist.” (pg. 40)
-“This relationship of culture to power is often mediated through such public culture phenomena as television.” (pg. 40)
-impossible to escape its (Yearnings) tenor in the lives of everyone
-show somehow became a social forece in people’s interpretations of it’s significance for their lives (pg. 41)
-personification of patriotism & nationness in Huifang’s character
-giving up everything for the her family
-aka a country giving things up for their nation
-war justifies in this context (?)
-Huifang represents China
-intellectual hero: Luo Gang
-embodies hope
-China needs its intellectuals (pg. 60)
-represents masculinity
-Modleski says that American heroes are feminized and have an appreciated of domesticity
-Luo Gang in not effeminate.
-“Yearnings demonstrates the capacity of allegory to generate a range of distinct meanings simultaneiously.” (pg. 61)
-the gay people in China are predominantly 30 or younger
-older generations do not come out?
-being gay is about sex, not part of culture? (pg. 87)
-socialism a big factor
-cultural citizenship à ESSENSE OF BELONGING (pg. 94)
-homosexuality is not illegal, but considered immoral
-police use “public morality” to close bars and to arrest people. (pg. 96)
-gay kindship and the need to carry on the patrilineal line
-Dennis Altman (pg. 90)
-global gay identity (?)
-what constitutes a universal gay identity?
-“contests sexual rather than gender norms; replaces the idea of the male…” (???)
No comments:
Post a Comment